collegehumor dating it39s complicated cat person - 14c dating error

I understand calibration might have something to do with this, but then in the article it says in italicized words that the uncalibrated date “Must Always Be Mentioned”. CMI’s Dr Rob Carter responds: Anthony, As a fan of biblical archaeology, I was asked to address your question.

But when I read articles about the results, they never mention the uncalibrated data, which could actually be correct. I am not an expert in every subject that impinges on the discussion, but I will do my best.

See: The walls of Jericho, The story of Jericho, and Q and A pages on the Ice Age and radiometric dating. A single experiment can prove me wrong." Please consult our Radiometric Dating Q&A section for answers to many of the questions you are asking. Carter incorrectly states "The rate of decay is also not in question.".

See also this useful offsite resource: Jericho chronology dispute. On this site alone there have been statements disputing the constancy of radioactive decay.

One such is FYIIndeed, as can be found in several more articles here: